Economic Growth and Environmental Pressure in Kazakhstan: Social Implications
https://doi.org/10.58732/2958-7212-2026-2-143-159
Abstract
In the context of increasing environmental pressures and waste volumes, there is a growing need to assess the relationship between economic growth and environmental performance indicators. The purpose of the study is to assess the relationship between Kazakhstan's economic growth and indicators of waste generation and recycling, energy consumption, energy intensity, and energy productivity. The study's information base consisted of official statistical data from the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2015-2024. The research employs normalization, gray relational analysis, and multiple regression analysis. According to the results of the gray relational analysis, the highest coefficients of correlation with GDP dynamics were established for the specific volume of municipal waste per unit of GDP (0.717), the volume of hazardous waste (0.714) and the volume of industrial waste (0.707), which indicates that the changes in these indicators most closely coincided with the direction and nature of the change in GDP in the studied period. The volume of hazardous waste has statistically significant negative relationship with GDP (B = -0.645; p = 0.012), while the association of industrial waste with GDP has not been statistically confirmed (B = -0.033; p = 0.827). The results show that Kazakhstan's economic growth was more closely related to an increase in waste volumes, especially hazardous waste, than to the development of recycling and increased energy efficiency. The findings substantiate the need to develop recycling infrastructure, strengthen control over hazardous waste, and transition to a more resourceefficient model of economic growth.
About the Authors
Zh. ZhailaubayevaKazakhstan
Zhadra Zhailaubayeva – PhD student, Senior Lecturer
Aktau
G. U. Joldasbayeva
Kazakhstan
Gulsara U. Joldasbayeva – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Professor
Aktau
A. D. Aimagambetova
Kazakhstan
Aida D. Aimagambetova – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Senior Lecturer
Kyzylorda
K. S. Jrauova
Kazakhstan
Kuralay S. Jrauova – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Senior Lecturer
Kyzylorda
References
1. Alshuwaikhat, H. M., Adenle, Y. A., & Alotaishan, T. N. (2023). The development of a grey relational analysis-based composite index for environmental sustainability assessment: Towards a net-zero emissions strategy in Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18192
2. Arion, F. H., Aleksanyan, V., Markosyan, D., & Arion, I. D. (2023). Circular pathways to sustainable development: understanding the links between circular economy indicators, economic growth, social well-being, and environmental performance in EU-27. Sustainability, 15(24), 16883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416883
3. Banjerdpaiboon, A., & Limleamthong, P. (2023). Assessment of national circular economy performance using superefficiency dual data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index: Case study of 27 European countries. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16584
4. Birat, J. P. (2015). Life-cycle assessment, resource efficiency and recycling. Metallurgical Research & Technology, 112(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2015009
5. Bureau of National Statistics. (2025). Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved December 15, 2024 from https://stat.gov.kz/en
6. Cerqueira, P. A., Soukiazis, E., & Proença, S. (2021). Assessing the linkages between recycling, renewable energy and sustainable development: evidence from the OECD countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 9766-9791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00780-4
7. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global environmental change, 26, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
8. Diyar, S., Akparova, A., Toktabayev, A., & Tyutunnikova, M. (2014). Green economy–innovation-based development of Kazakhstan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.497
9. Fritz, M., & Koch, M. (2014). Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries. Ecological Economics, 108, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.021
10. Garg, V., Kaushik, P., & Kumar, A. (2025). A cross-country panel study on the impact of circular economy on resource efficiency. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02300-8
11. Guoyan, S., Khaskheli, A., Raza, S. A., & Ahmed, M. (2022). Nonlinear impact of municipal solid waste recycling and energy efficiency on environmental performance and economic growth: evidence from non-parametric causality-in-quantiles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(11), 16066-16081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16721-1
12. Imangali, Z., & Bekturganova, M. (2024). Sustainable growth in Kazakhstan: Green economy, decarbonization and energy transition. Technoeconomics, 3, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.57809/2024.3.1.8.2
13. Kose, E., Burmaoglu, S., & Kabak, M. (2013). Grey relational analysis between energy consumption and economic growth. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 3(3), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-06-2013-0010
14. Koçak, D. (2020). Green growth dynamics in OECD countries: an application of grey relational analysis. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 10(4), 545-563. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-01-2020-0016
15. Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., Leskinen, P., Kuikman, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of cleaner production, 139, 361-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024
16. Ospanova, A., Popovychenko, I. P., & Chuprina, E. (2022). Green economy–Vector of sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(1), 171–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.16
17. Trushkina, N. (2022). Green economy in the conditions of modern challenges: conceptual frameworks. International Science Journal of Management, Economics & Finance, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjmef.20220101.1
18. Valero, A., Valero, A., & Calvo, G. (2015). Using thermodynamics to improve the resource efficiency indicator GDP/DMC. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 94, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.001
19. Zhandar, A., Asanbayeva, A., & Zhakypbek, A. (2025). The problem of developing the green economy as a tool of sustainable development in Kazakhstan. Geography and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.31489/3106-9649/2025-1-1.GSD/27-33
20. Zhironkin, S., & Cehlár, M. (2022). Green economy and sustainable development: The outlook. Energies, 15(3), 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031167
21. Zvarych, R., Masna, O., & Rivilis, I. (2022). Methodological principles of the formation the concept of green economy. Herald of Economics, 4, 131-144. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2022.04.131
Review
For citations:
Zhailaubayeva Zh., Joldasbayeva G.U., Aimagambetova A.D., Jrauova K.S. Economic Growth and Environmental Pressure in Kazakhstan: Social Implications. Qainar Journal of Social Science. 2026;5(2):143-159. https://doi.org/10.58732/2958-7212-2026-2-143-159
JATS XML












