«Big Data» technology in the digital transformation of the economy

   The authors aimed to investigate the essence and fundamentals of the functioning of "Big Data" in the digital economy and the features of successful use of "Big Data" technology by enterprises as a new economic resource. "Big Data" is presented by the authors as a new economic resource and digital technology, which allow by solving a priority task, i. e. the allocation at the conceptual level of research of the most significant factors (resources) that determine the organizational potential for the use of big data. The article emphasizes that in the ordinary sense, the term "big data" is simply associated with a large amount of information. However, the study of the reasons why companies decide to invest in big data projects shows that the main motivating factor for them is not a large amount of data as such, but their diversity, which allows obtaining quantitative and qualitative information about a complex (complex) system of material and non-material factors of a modern company. The authors state that the expected information revolution consists in the way we analyze business and justify management decisions, and it is due not just to an exponential, avalanche-like growth in the volume of big data, but to the emergence of a new quality of information as a result of such growth - information that analysts could not even dream of ten years ago. The problematic materials of the article are presented as follows: first, the analysis of publications necessary to determine the content of the concept of "big data" is given, and positive and normative models of big data are highlighted. Further, on the basis of a resource-oriented approach and based on the results of an empirical study of foreign leading companies in the implementation of big data projects, a conceptual model of intra-company factors determining the organizational potential of using big data is being developed. As a result, recommendations are formulated for domestic companies implementing or making decisions about projects using big data.

1. Sejahtera F., Wang W., Indulska M., Sadiq S. Enablers and Inhibitors of Effective Use of Big Data: Insights from a Case Study // Proceedings of PACIS 2018 - 22^nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Ed. Tanabu M., Senoo D. Yokohama. – 2018.[Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/27/ (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

2. Big Data Executive Survey 2016 // An Update on the Adoption of Big Data in the Fortune 1000. Boston: New Vantage Partners LLC. – 2016. – P. 16. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: http://www.datascienceassn.org/sites/default/files/Big%20Data%20Executive%20Survey%202016.pdf (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

3. Клейнер Г. Б. Системная парадигма и системный менеджмент // Российский журнал менеджмента. – 2008. – Т. 6. – №. 3. – С. 27-50. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: https://rjm.spbu.ru/article/%20view/475/406 (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

4. Бахенская М. В. Интеллектуальный капитал организации: методологические подходы к определению // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология. – 2011. – №. 3. – С. 280-285.

5. Cox M., Ellsworth D. Managing big data for scientific visualization // ACM siggraph. – MRJ / NASA Ames Research Center, - 1997. – Vol. 97. – №. 1. – Р. 21-38.

6. Laney D. et al. 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety // META group research note. – 2001. – Vol. 6. – №. 70. – Р. 134-145.

7. Blazquez D., Domenech J. Big Data sources and methods for social and economic analyses //Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2018. – Vol. 130. – Р. 99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.027

8. Ghoshal A., Larson E. C., Subramanyam R., Shaw, M. J. The impact of business analytics strategy on social, mobile, and cloud computing adoption. – 2014. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: https://web.archive.org/web/20180720080704id_/http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=icis2014 (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

9. Günther W. A. et al. Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. – 2017. – Vol. 26. – №. 3. – Р. 191-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.003

10. Kouanou A. T. et al. An optimal big data workflow for biomedical image analysis // Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. – 2018. – Vol. 11. – Р. 68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2018.05.001

11. Manyika C. J., Miremadi M. Where Machines Could Replace Humans – and Where They Can’t (yet). N.-Y.: McKinsey Quarterlyю - 2018. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: http://dln.jaipuria.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2951/1/Where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet.pdf (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

12. Davenport T., Bean R. Big Data Executive Survey 2017. Executive summary of findings // New Vantage Partners. – 2017. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: https://www.privacyitalia.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Big-Data-Executive-Survey-2017-Executive-Summary.pdf (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

13. Tallon P. P. Corporate governance of big data: Perspectives on value, risk, and cost // Computer. – 2013. – Vol. 46. – №. 6. – С. 32-38. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6519236 (өтінім берілген күні 24. 04. 2023).

14. Когденко В. Г., Мельник М. В. Современные тенденции в бизнес-анализе: исследование экосистемы компании, анализ информационной составляющей бизнес-модели, оценка возможностей роста // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. – 2017. – Т. 16. – №. 10 (469). – С. 1878-1897. doi: 10.24891/ea.16.10.1878

15. Малиновская Н. В. Концепция множественности капиталов в интегрированной отчетности // Международный бухгалтерский учет. – 2018. – Т. 21. – №. 6 (444). – С. 700-713. doi: 10.24891/ia.21.6.700

16. Луканина А. В. Анализ базовых категорий МСФО в рамках принципа приоритета содержания над формой // Международный бухгалтерский учет. – 2016. – №. 2 (392). – С. 19-33.

17. Ackoff R. L. From data to wisdom //Journal of applied systems analysis. – 1989. – Т. 16. – №. 1. – С. 3-9.

18. Rowley J. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy // Journal of information science. – 2007. – Т. 33. – №. 2. – С. 163-180. doi: 10.1177/0165551506070706

19. Boisot M. Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. - Oxford: OUP. –1998. – 312 p.

20. LaValle S., Lesser E., Shockley R., Hopkins M. S., Kruschwitz N. Big Data, Analytics and the Path from Insights to Value // MIT sloan management review. – 2013. – № 2. – Т. 21. – Р. 20–31. [Электрондық ресурс]. Қолжетімді: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/big-data-analytics-and-the-path-from-insights-to-value/

21. McIver D., Lengnick-Hall C. The causal ambiguity paradox: Deliberate actions under causal ambiguity // Strategic Organization. – 2018. – Vol. 16. – №. 3. – P. 304-322. doi: 10.1177/1476127017740081

22. Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management // Strategic management journal. – 1997. – Vol. 18. – №. 7. – P. 509-533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

23. Gao J., Koronios A., Selle S. Towards a Process View on Critical Success Factors in Big Data Analytics, Projects // Proceedings of Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico. – 2015. – P. 1–14.

24. Edvinsson L. Developing intellectual capital at Skandia // Long range planning. – 1997. – Vol. 30. – №. 3. – P. 366-373. doi: 10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90248-X

25. Smith G. T. On construct validity: issues of method and measurement // Psychological assessment. – 2005. – Vol. 17. – № 4. – P. 386-396. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396

26. Given L. M. The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. - New York: Sage publications, 2008. – 1043 p.