Коллективное лидерство, карьерное развитие и социальная мобильность в слаборазвитых регионах Китая

Несмотря на возрастающий интерес к проблемам лидерства, карьерного развития и социальной мобильности работников знаний, механизмы влияния распределенного (коллективного) лидерства на профессиональное продвижение в условиях слаборазвитых регионов остаются недостаточно изученными. Цель исследования — оценить влияние распределенного лидерства на карьерное развитие и социальную мобильность работников знаний в слаборазвитых регионах Китая, а также определить опосредующую роль самоэффективности и коллаборативного климата. В исследовании использованы количественные методы анализа и моделирование структурными уравнениями на основе частичных наименьших квадратов (PLS-SEM) с применением программного обеспечения SmartPLS 4.0. Эмпирической базой послужили данные анкетного опроса 150 работников знаний, занятых в сферах управления, образования, технологий и здравоохранения в провинциях Гуанси и Гуйчжоу (Китай). По результатам исследования установлено, что распределенное лидерство выступает значимым фактором карьерного развития и социальной мобильности работников знаний в слаборазвитых регионах Китая. Выявлено, что распределенное лидерство оказывает прямое положительное влияние на карьерное развитие работников знаний (β = 0.326; p < 0.001), а также косвенное воздействие через механизмы самоэффективности и коллаборативного климата. Высокое значение коэффициента детерминации (R² = 0.593) свидетельствует о существенной объясняющей способности предложенной модели и подтверждает важность лидерских и организационных факторов для профессионального развития в условиях ресурсных ограничений. Полученные результаты подчеркивают необходимость внедрения практик распределенного лидерства, поддержки профессиональной самостоятельности сотрудников и формирования культуры сотрудничества.

1. Abrha, T. G., & Weldeyohans, B. T. (2025). The role of human capital in economic development: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20251302.11

2. Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: Mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 48(5), 602–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793301

3. Bourguignon, F., & Platteau, J.-P. (2023). Institutional Obstacles to Structural Transformation. Institutional Challenges at the Early Stages of Development: Lessons from a Multi-Country Study, 221–322. part, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009285735.010

4. Braut, H., Nes, S., Storm, M., & Mikkelsen, A. (2022). General practitioners' perceptions of distributed leadership in providing integrated care for elderly chronic multi-morbid patients: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 22, 1085. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08460-x

5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman

6. Cao, J., Huang, Y., Shao, X., & Zhong, Y. (2025). Driving innovation: Exploring the effect of distributed leadership on collective teacher innovativeness in Chinese schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(1), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00866-x

7. China Statistical Yearbook. (2025). China Statistical Yearbook 2025. China Statistics Press. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2025/indexch.html

8. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

9. Deming, D.J. (2022). Four facts about human capital. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(3), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.3.75

10. Fan, X., & Chu, Z. (2025). The Influence of Distributed Leadership on Chinese Teachers’ Job Satisfaction: The Chain Mediation of Teacher Collaboration and Teacher Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(4), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040507

11. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School Leadership & Management, 42(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620

12. Hirschi, A., Steiner, R. S., Burmeister, A., & Johnston, C. S. (2020). A whole-life perspective of sustainable careers: The nature and consequences of nonwork orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103319

13. Kovač, N., Žugić, D., Rashid, A.A. & Żmija, K. (2026).The socioeconomic capacities driving human capital development: a comparative study across selected countries. Qual Quant (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-02774-2

14. Javed, M.A., Reba, A., & Saleem, A. (2025). Reimagining school leadership: A qualitative study on how distributed leadership models influence innovation culture in semi-government schools in Pakistan. British Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 930-951. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70016

15. Leithwood, K. A., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868539

16. Lin, Q. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher innovativeness: Mediating roles of teacher autonomy and professional collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 948152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948152

17. Liu, J., Qiang, F., & Kang, H. (2021). Distributed leadership, self-efficacy and wellbeing in schools: A study of relations among teachers in Shanghai. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01696-w

18. Liu, Q., & Sun, Y. (2025). The impact of collab，ative atmosphere on innovative work behavior of college teachers, North China. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1497503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497503

19. Luwei, W., & Huimin, M. (2024). From jobs to careers: Drivers and barriers to career development in emerging labor markets. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1486871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1486871

20. Ly, N. B. (2020). Cultural influences on leadership: Western-dominated leadership and non-Western conceptualizations of leadership. Sociology and Anthropology, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2020.080101

21. Nguyen, C. D., Huynh, T. N., & Tran, N. H. (2025). Overcoming contextual constraints: implementing classroom pedagogical innovation through teacher leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 28(2), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2013543

22. Or, M.H., & Berkovich, I. (2023). Participative decision making in schools in individualist and collectivist cultures: The micro-politics behind distributed leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(3), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211001364

23. Scott, W. D., & Cervone, D. (2024). The social-cognitive clinician: On the implications of social cognitive theory for psychotherapy and assessment. International Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13125

24. Sharmelly, R. (2016). Innovation for emerging markets confronting institutional environment challenges: Perspectives from visionary leadership and institutional entrepreneurship. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 108. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v11n6p108

25. Somani, B. (2024). Theoretical underpinnings of leadership: A review perspective. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.22048

26. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2020). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(3), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576

27. Wang, G., Bai, H., Tsang, K. K., & Bian, J. (2025). The effect of teacher collaboration on teachers' career well-being in China: A moderated mediation model of teacher self-efficacy and distributed leadership. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105303

28. Woodier, D., & Thuesen, C. (2024). Distributed leadership and the shaping of infrastructure project portfolios. Project Leadership and Society, 5, 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100146

29. van Veen, K., van Tartwijk, J., & Verloop, N. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership and inquiry-based work on primary teachers’ capacity to change: Testing a model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1746363

30. Yiming, Y., Shi, B., Kayani, S., & Biasutti, M. (2024). Examining the relationship between self-efficacy, career development, and subjective wellbeing in physical education students. Scientific Reports, 14, 8551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59238-6

31. Zhao,Y., Li X., & Kang, H.(2025) Linking distributed leadership to teachers’ innovation: Chain mediating roles of commitment and collaboration in Chinese schools. PLOS ONE, 20(9), e0333118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333118